| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| jedisb |
Posted - 08 Dec 2005 : 05:14:49
I just wanted to ask about this. I followed the link at hexagora.com to the W3C validation page. The page was compliant as stated, but there was also a link on that page to validate the CSS[/url] for the page and the result was that the CSS had several errors. I was just wondering if these issues were being addressed in a future release. Here is the link to the results page:
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hexagora.com%2Fen_dw_dhe.asp
Also, I just noticed that not every page on the site is W3C valid:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hexagora.com%2Fen_dw_evd.asp&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&verbose=1 |
| 2 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| jedisb |
Posted - 09 Dec 2005 : 14:25:21
Thanks for the reply! |
| s.dav |
Posted - 09 Dec 2005 : 11:30:07
Hello jedi,
don't worry about these problems in my site CSS because they are caused by a CSS file made by my hands (and not by Dynamic HTML Editor) that uses some browser specific extension (for IE to make the flat scrollbar) that are not supported by W3C.
The only imperfection is this:
Line : 1 (Level : 2) font-family: You are encouraged to offer a generic family as a last alternative : .verdana100FFFFFFt
because in the file fonts.ini I haven't putted a generic alternative for the Verdana font. I've to make some tests for this ;-) |
